Title: Manufacturing Process Development for Adhesively Bonded Joints in Large-Scale Space Structures

Authors: William E. Guin, James R. Newton, David E. Lawrence, Phillip D. Thompson, Andrew N. Martin, Casey C. Wolfe, Justin R. Jackson, and Sandi G. Miller

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/c.19.0663

Abstract: In order to take full advantage of the weight savings and performance gains offered by the use of composite materials in large-scale space structures, adhesively bonded joints must be considered. While bonded joint manufacturing at laboratory scale can be straightforward, the same manufacturing processes are not trivial at full scale. Surface preparation becomes particularly challenging (a viable process must yield consistent results over a large application area and be repeatable for multiple application sites), as does the application of heat to cure the doublers and/or bond them to the primary structure (the nature and scale of assembled or partially assembled aerospace structures often necessitates an out-of-oven/out-of-autoclave approach). In this work, bonded joint manufacturing processes are adapted for a full-scale (approximately 30 feet in diameter at the aft end) composite payload adapter at the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. By iterating across a range of variables, process parameters for adhesively bonded joints on a large-scale composite structure have been developed. Primary findings are presented with respect to overarching bonded joint manufacturing concepts so as to maximize the applicability of this work to similar material systems and structures.

References: [1] Sleight DW, Segal KN, Guin WE, McDougal MR, Wolfe CC, Johnston MM, et al. Development of Composite Sandwich Bonded Longitudinal Joints for Space Launch Vehicle Structures. AIAA SciTech 2019 Forum, 2019. doi:10.2514/6.2019-0236. [2] Kanerva M, Saarela O. The peel ply surface treatment for adhesive bonding of composites : A review. Int J Adhes Adhes 2013;43:60–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.014. [3] Bardis J, Kedward K. DOT/FAA/AR-01/8: Effects of Surface Preparation on Long-Term Durability of Composite Adhesive Bonds. 2001. [4] Bardis J, Kedward K. DOT/FAA/AR-03/53: Effects of Surface Preparation on the Long-Term Durability of Adhesively Bonded Composite Joints. 2004. [5] Tracey A. Improving Adhesive Bonding of Composites Through Surface Characterization Improving Adhesive Bonding Through Surface Characterization. JAMS 2014 Tech. Rev., Seattle, WA: 2014. [6] Tracey AC. Effect of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment on Surface Characteristics and Adhesive Bond Quality of Peel Ply Prepared Composites. University of Washington, 2014. [7] Williams TS, Yu H, Hicks RF. of Polymers and Composites for Adhesive Bonding : A Critical Review. Rev Adhes Adhes 2013;1:46–87. doi:10.7569/RAA.2013.097302. [8] Serrano JS. Surface Modifications of Composite Materials by Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 2011. [9] Encinas N, Oakley BR, Belcher MA, Blohowiak KY, Dillingham RG, Abenojar J, et al. Surface modification of aircraft used composites for adhesive bonding. Int J Adhes Adhes 2014;50:157–63. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.004. [10] Kubiak KJ, Wilson MCT, Mathia TG, Carval P. Wettability versus roughness of engineering surfaces. Wear 2011;271:523–8. [11] Effect of Surface Roughness on Contact Angle Measurements Obtained with the Surface Analyst. Cincinnati, OH: 2016. [12] Belcher MA, Krieg KL, Van Voast PJ, Blohowiak KY. Nonchemical Surface Treatments Using Atmospheric Plasma Systems for Structural Adhesive Bonding. SAMPE 2013, Long Beach, CA: 2013. [13] Tracey AC, Belcher MA, Blohowiak KY, Flinn BD. Improving Adhesive Bonding through Surface Characterization: Reverse the Curse of the Nylon Peel Ply? SAMPE 2014, Seattle, WA: 2014. [14] Budhe S, Banea M., de Barros S, da Silva LFM. An updated review of adhesively bonded joints in composite materials. Int J Adhes Adhes 2017;72:30–42. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.010.

Conference: CAMX 2019

Publication Date: 2019/09/23

SKU: TP19-0663

Pages: 15

Price: $30.00