Title: Exploring Bio-Based Composites: A Comparison of Short Beam Shear Strength with Conventional Materials

Authors: Nachiket S. Makh, Ajit D. Kelkar

DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/c.25.193

Abstract: In recent years, the aerospace and automotive industry has made significant strides in adopting sustainable materials and technologies. One of the most promising developments is the increasing use of green composites, which are made from natural fibers and bio-based or recyclable resins. These green materials offer mechanical properties that rival or even exceed those of traditional composites, making them an attractive alternative for the aerospace sector. This shift is driven by industry’s commitment to reducing carbon emissions, enhancing fuel efficiency, and meeting stringent environmental regulations. Green composites offer a compelling eco-friendly alternative to conventional carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP), which have been extensively used in aircraft components such as fuselage panels, wings, and interiors. CFRPs are favored for their high strength-to-weight ratio, but their production is energy-intensive and heavily reliant on finite resources. In contrast, green composites provide the same lightweight benefits while significantly reducing the environmental impact associated with their manufacturing, use, and disposal. A key factor in determining the suitability of composites for both primary and secondary aerospace structures is their interlaminar shear strength, which plays a critical role in resisting delamination and shear failure. High short beam shear strength values are essential for materials to withstand transverse loads, making them suitable for applications like access panels, fairings, and interior cabin parts. In this study, the short beam shear strength of green composites cured using a bio-based hardener, is compared with that of conventional composites. The study indicated that short beam shear strength of bio-based composite was 19% higher than conventional composites.

References: 1. Ghosh, A. K., Dwivedi, M., Ghosh, A. K., & Dwivedi, M. (2020). Advantages and applications of polymeric composites. Processability of polymeric composites, 29-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3933-8_2 2. Oladele, I. O., Omotosho, T. F., & Adediran, A. A. (2020). Polymer‐based composites: an indispensable material for present and future applications. International Journal of Polymer Science, 2020(1), 8834518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8834518 3. Makh, N. S., Zhang, L., Tucker, J., & Kelkar, A. D. (2024). Eco-Friendly Composites: Fabrication and Characterization of Polymer Composites made from Bio-Based Curing Agent. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33599/nasampe/s.24.0195 4. Rochester, J. R. (2013). Bisphenol A and human health: A review of the literature. Reproductive Toxicology, 42, 132–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.08.008 5. Aalto‐Korte, K., Suuronen, K., Kuuliala, O., Henriks‐Eckerman, M. L., & Jolanki, R. (2014). Contact allergy to epoxy hardeners. Contact dermatitis, 71(3), 145-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12280 6. Pfäffli, P., Hämeilä, M., Riala, R., Tornaeus, J., & Wirmoila, R. (2004). Exposure to methylhexahydrophthalic anhydride (MHHPA) in two workplaces of the electric industry. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 6(4), 295-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/B310964J 7. Buekens, A., &Huang, H. (1998). Comparative evaluation of techniques for controlling the formation and emission of chlorinated dioxins/furans in municipal waste incineration. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 62(1), 1-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(98)00153-8 8. Shekar, H. S. S., & Ramachandra, M. (2018). Green Composites: A Review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(1), 2518–2526. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.034 9. Makh, N.S., Zhang, L. & Kelkar, A.D. Substituting the epoxy curing agent with a greener solution-towards sustainability. MRS Advances 9, 1011–1014 (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/s43580-024-00855-8 10. Baroncini, E. A., Kumar Yadav, S., Palmese, G. R., & Stanzione III, J. F. (2016). Recent advances in bio‐based epoxy resins and bio‐based epoxy curing agents. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 133(45). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.44103 11. Makh, N. S., Tucker, J., & Kelkar, A. D. (2024). Evaluation of Impact Resistance of Composites Utilizing Bio-Based Curing Agent for Aerospace Applications. DOI: 10.33599/nasampe/s.23.0175 12. Cardolite Corporation. (2017-2024) Phenalkamine Curing Agents. https://www.cardolite.com/technology/phenalkamines/ 13. ASTM Standard D2344/D2344M-22, 2022, "Standard Test Method for Short-Beam Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials and Their Laminates" ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2022. DOI: 10.1520/D2344_D2344M-22 14. D. K. Shinde and A. D. Kelkar, “Effect of TEOS Electrospun Nanofiber Modified Resin on Interlaminar Shear Strength of Glass Fiber / Epoxy Composite,” Int. J. Chem. Mol. Nucl. Metallurgical Eng., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 54–60, 2014.

Conference: CAMX 2025

Publication Date: 2025/09/08

SKU: 193

Pages: 8

Price: $16.00